tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post1830942471395147147..comments2024-03-05T06:32:37.180-05:00Comments on The Daly Planet: Darlington "In The Dark" On ThursdayDaly Planet Editorhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13834588435004023666noreply@blogger.comBlogger31125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-42460153691917104132008-05-10T11:15:00.000-04:002008-05-10T11:15:00.000-04:00Well, it certainly turned out that this six hour p...Well, it certainly turned out that this six hour period was one of the most memorable in recent NASCAR history in terms of practice sessions for both series.<BR/><BR/>Again, the technology to bring life to full-speed on-track sessions exists for a low cost. What fans missed at Darlington, on the first day of practice with the new pavement will never happen again. It is gone and that is a shame.<BR/><BR/>JDDaly Planet Editorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13834588435004023666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-3055595581346661772008-05-08T23:23:00.000-04:002008-05-08T23:23:00.000-04:00I have wondered why there is no televised practice...I have wondered why there is no televised practice on either speed or espn2. I do believe that Speed does a better job, but question why ESPN even bothers with NASCAR. I agree with Mary who says ALL NASCAR programming should be on speed the entire season. I am not looking forward to TNT and ESPN2 for the Cup races, it is bad enough for Nationwide. <BR/><BR/>Thanks for having this blog. I know that they are being read by those who make the BIG decisions.<BR/><BR/>MarilynAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-40082727279031184792008-05-08T09:54:00.000-04:002008-05-08T09:54:00.000-04:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-33946717696006949962008-05-08T06:07:00.000-04:002008-05-08T06:07:00.000-04:00Operating income at the television unit rose to $4...Operating income at the television unit rose to $419 million on a 15 percent jump in sales to $1.8 billion. Cable network sales gained 27 percent to $1.27 billion on higher fees collected by Fox News, while operating income jumped 17 percent to $330 million.<BR/><BR/>News Corp. today reaffirmed its projection that operating income will rise about 15 percent this year. <BR/><BR/>http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a123xQo9v8kIAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-68135156815774185382008-05-08T05:45:00.000-04:002008-05-08T05:45:00.000-04:00Operating profit at the cable division that includ...Operating profit at the cable division that includes ESPN and the Disney Channel rose 14 percent to $1.09 billion as pay- television operators paid higher fees to the company to carry its channels. Sales gained 9.3 percent to $2.11 billion.<BR/><BR/>http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&sid=a99A0NmawRHUAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-78581617035725937852008-05-08T01:14:00.000-04:002008-05-08T01:14:00.000-04:00@glen--thanks for the info!I agree with strckinfan...@glen--thanks for the info!<BR/><BR/>I agree with strckinfan that the fans are hungrier for this information then they might have been when TNN was doing it. No, not every fan will tune in to *every* thing but for those of us who *do* want to watch as much as we can, it would be nice to have the choice. <BR/><BR/>Sure it might flop, but it would be nice to give us "new" fans a chance.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-66591610543905524152008-05-08T00:01:00.000-04:002008-05-08T00:01:00.000-04:00I'm ticked at DISH network for not having Hi-Def. ...I'm ticked at DISH network for not having Hi-Def. I probably will not watch the Winston this year.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-91219864106523842062008-05-07T22:30:00.000-04:002008-05-07T22:30:00.000-04:00stricklinfan82 said... On this date you are laughi...<B>stricklinfan82 said... On this date you are laughing at the thought of every Cup and Nationwide practice and qualifying session being televised. But someday that laughter will stop as well, when NASCAR TV takes the next step in its evolutionary process.</B><BR/><BR/><B>Daly Planet Editor said... These practice sessions were on-the-air back when TNN has this TV package. Things have not progressed, they have gone backwards....</B><BR/><BR/><BR/>Stricklinfan, You can't have it both ways! I guess the only people that were laughing where the executives in charge of the recent TV contracts when a suggestion was made to air all practice sessions live. TNN tried it, and after a careful evaulation, nobody felt it was worth while to follow them up on it. Its been done already, and there are some very good reasons why it hasn't been repeated.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-88985604686334112332008-05-07T21:51:00.000-04:002008-05-07T21:51:00.000-04:00Anonymous said... Like I said before. In the TV co...<B>Anonymous said... <BR/>Like I said before. In the TV contract it does not state "ESPN AND SPEED WILL CARRY EVERY NATIONWIDE AND CUP SERIES PRACTICE."<BR/><BR/>I don't know where you guys think that the networks are going to be carrying every practice session every weekend. Its not possible.<BR/><BR/>May 7, 2008 7:20 PM</B><BR/><BR/>Sir or ma'am, what we are doing is simply stating that we would like to see these TV blackouts of select practice and qualifying sessions removed.<BR/><BR/>No one is accusing ESPN or Speed of violating the terms of their contract. And no one is saying that ESPN or Speed are not justified in not covering these sessions, for financial reasons, ratings reasons, or whatever the circumstances may be.<BR/><BR/>We are merely expressing that there is an interest on our parts to have an outlet for these currently untelevised sessions. I suggested an all-NASCAR channel, someone else suggested NASCAR.com, and I'm sure many others have their own ideas.<BR/><BR/>You may not care for qualifying and/or practice sessions and find them "boring". You are certainly entitled to your own personal taste. But I hope you can respect the fact that others feel differently.<BR/><BR/>We are not "wrong" for having a desire to see these sessions on TV and there is nothing unrealistic or impossible about adding coverage of these events in some way, shape, or form.<BR/><BR/>TV coverage of NASCAR is an evolutionary process.<BR/><BR/>People laughed at the thought of a 500-mile Cup race being televised live and flag-to-flag. That laughter stopped in 1979. People laughed at the thought of the entire Cup schedule being televised. That laughter stopped in 1986. People laughed at the thought of the entire Cup schedule being televised flag-to-flag. That laughter stopped in 1989. People laughed at the thought of the entire Cup schedule being televised live. That laughter stopped in 1994. And people laughed at the thought of Cup qualifying being televised every week. That laughter was silenced in 2001.<BR/><BR/>On this date you are laughing at the thought of every Cup and Nationwide practice and qualifying session being televised. But someday that laughter will stop as well, when NASCAR TV takes the next step in its evolutionary process.<BR/><BR/>Nothing is impossible or unrealistic.stricklinfan82https://www.blogger.com/profile/01808897974344304657noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-21852592199912407442008-05-07T21:36:00.000-04:002008-05-07T21:36:00.000-04:00ESPN and SPEED aren't non-profit public television...ESPN and SPEED aren't non-profit public television networks. They are businesses wanting to make money, and lots of it. If there was a market to air practice sessions on a general sports network, ESPN would pick them up. If there was a market to air them on a specialty network, I have no doubt SPEED would spend the production money to have everything in place when the N-Wide haulers arrive. <BR/><BR/>The fact remains that neither ESPN nor SPEED feel that carrying every practice session from a LONG 10 month NASCAR season is a worthwhile investment. <BR/><BR/>There may be a small contingent of NASCAR diehards that want this content, but if a specialty network like SPEED doesn't want to air all the practice sessions, then there just isn't a business case to carry them. <BR/><BR/>Throwing them on the Internet isn't a panacea in itself. Check out Mark Cuban's latest blog entry (blogmaverick.com) for his take on streaming video content. The production costs aren't any cheaper, though its much harder to generate the revenue to cover those costs for a variety of reasons. Again, the problem isn't the lack of a delivery medium. If SPEED or ESPN wanted to find the airtime, they'd do it in a heartbeat. You already stated the current programming, at least in your opinion, is rather light. It all boils down to the lack of demand.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-4925748025483215592008-05-07T19:20:00.000-04:002008-05-07T19:20:00.000-04:00Like I said before. In the TV contract it does not...Like I said before. In the TV contract it does not state "ESPN AND SPEED WILL CARRY EVERY NATIONWIDE AND CUP SERIES PRACTICE."<BR/><BR/>I don't know where you guys think that the networks are going to be carrying every practice session every weekend. Its not possible.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-27990502396032744782008-05-07T14:51:00.000-04:002008-05-07T14:51:00.000-04:00glen,Your comment about lack of broadband is a key...glen,<BR/><BR/>Your comment about lack of broadband is a key to this discussion. The current broadband technology is quickly bypassing cable TV and moving video content directly to the end-user with the network middleman. <BR/><BR/>That is one reason the cable TV companies are crazy to get their broadband into your house. <BR/><BR/>Other than HD, there is simply not too much missing, especially when many desk tops can now feed a big screen as a monitor.<BR/><BR/>We have seen the DIRT and NASCAR and F-1 Series embrace live broadband presentations of racing and we can only expect this to grow. <BR/><BR/>If one sponsor like Bud or Office Depot steps-up, it might be interesting to see them take all the non-televised practices and stick them on NASCAR.com for next season.<BR/><BR/>JDDaly Planet Editorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13834588435004023666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-58504176972145093322008-05-07T13:52:00.000-04:002008-05-07T13:52:00.000-04:00I won't belabor the point (thank you anon 1:25), b...I won't belabor the point (thank you anon 1:25), but in my limited business knowledge--a business doesn't do anything unless it's somehow monetarily advantageous for them to do so. I once worked for a retail company that had a flagship building full of history. It was costing the company millions to keep it open--when we closed it, the community hated us. They cared about tradition, and the outpouring was heartwarming--but it didn't pay the bills. Selfishly on my part, I would like to see as much programming as possible, but I try and be realistic about how that can feasibly be done.<BR/><BR/>I have limited speed DSL and can't watch things online without 'choppiness'. And I think a lot of NASCAR fans don't even have that, but it would at least be something to appease the fans who do, it's a good idea. But again, it would have to have enough use to pay for itself in some way.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-35583279870822848872008-05-07T13:25:00.000-04:002008-05-07T13:25:00.000-04:00The problem is that you both are believing that in...<B>The problem is that you both are believing that in 2008 cable TV is driving the bus. Nothing could be further from the truth.<BR/></B><BR/><BR/>But you've given no indication otherwise. If it's not the truth, what is the truth? Glenc1's thoughts and speculation about the situation are fairly right on, in my view. <BR/><BR/>In your original column and past columns you seem fixed on the point that ESPN and SPEED aren't carrying the practices. Those are cable channels last time I checked. So if these cable channels aren't important and driving the bus, what difference does it make if they carry practices? Why write about it? You said<BR/><BR/><B>The missing piece of the Thursday puzzle is television.</B><BR/> <BR/>If TV isn't driving the bus, then take the practices straight to online and mobile content, without announcers, and then no one will have to worry if they're on the TV airwaves.<BR/><BR/><B>Rise above the concerns that are upsetting you and think big picture.</B><BR/><BR/>I'm not the least bit upset about practices not airing live (or at all) because I DO know the ad market and the big picture. I'm just puzzled why it has been the complaint so frequently the past few weeks when ESPN2 is making it very clear it has no interest in carrying most Nationwide practices or qualifying, at least while they're not carrying the Cup series. I'd guess they have their reasons (ratings, revenue, expenses) for that decision. Big picture, NASCAR practices are not high priority for TV. Whether they were in the past is immaterial.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-83056032940428315412008-05-07T13:07:00.000-04:002008-05-07T13:07:00.000-04:00I still don't get all the hoopla surrounding wheth...I still don't get all the hoopla surrounding whether or not the networks air Cup or Nationwide practices. I usually find it incredibly boring unless I'm actually at the track.<BR/><BR/>Perhaps that has more to do with the TV coverage then actual practice. I still do DVR practice while I'm at work, but I can watch 5 hours worth of practice in under a half hour. Unless they're showing my driver out on the track, or interviewing him or his crew chief, I don't really feel I'm missing anything by not watching. And when they do manage to show my driver on the track, the analysts aren't usually even talking about him. (Usually they're droning on and on about his 3 teammates...)<BR/><BR/>So the point is, while it's great the networks have the opportunity to air practice, it's not must-see TV. And until the networks can figure out a way to make it consistently visually and audially interesting to someone sitting on the couch, I'm fine with the way it currently is.JHDhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09520556026815084964noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-19262099252860309152008-05-07T12:41:00.000-04:002008-05-07T12:41:00.000-04:00The problem is that you both are believing that in...The problem is that you both are believing that in 2008 cable TV is driving the bus. Nothing could be further from the truth.<BR/><BR/>The sports TV industry is in a time of turmoil, and NASCAR is right there in the mix.<BR/><BR/>It is going to be up to NASCAR to remember that they only have thirty eight opportunities to showcase their talented drivers "at speed" on the tracks. <BR/><BR/>38 is less than one half of a baseball season before the playoffs for one MLB team.<BR/><BR/>As I said in my column in February of 2007, we all knew ESPN and ESPN2 were "full" of existing programming when NASCAR made the deal. Our first question was what will happen to practice and how will Nationwide races get shown in football season?<BR/><BR/>The answer was practice is going to be dropped and Nationwide races will get moved to ESPN Classic. That is the bitter pill that NASCAR swallowed to get the Cup races on ABC. <BR/><BR/>Now, a year and a half later, teams like Petty and Woods and Ganassi are out of the Top 35 and all of a sudden practice is just not practice anymore. <BR/><BR/>Top teams with multi-million dollar sponsors are thrashing to save their futures and NASCAR fans are in the dark...literally.<BR/><BR/>Rise above the concerns that are upsetting you and think big picture. Maybe a nice first step would be streaming practice on NASCAR.com along with a live chatroom to see how it goes.<BR/><BR/>Thanks for all the views, it certainly does show very clearly the current state of cable TV and the economy.<BR/><BR/>JDDaly Planet Editorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13834588435004023666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-26927184084244399362008-05-07T12:30:00.000-04:002008-05-07T12:30:00.000-04:00JD, I think I get what you're saying but...just tr...JD, I think I get what you're saying but...just trying to think it through...(I was referring more to the Nationwide coverage than Cup, but I probably didn't make that clear.)<BR/><BR/>But in either case, if I am ESPN/Speed I'm asking myself which gets higher ratings/revenue *when* I am showing it (the numbers would say there are probably time periods where they have more/fewer viewers, plus considering what it on the other networks as competition). If it's just time-shifting that makes it a wash, then why *aren't* they showing it live (or at all)? I'm just thinking if it was ecnomically advantageous they'd show it instead of the programs, so I'm figuring there's more to it that I don't know. I know sometimes networks intentionally take a loss, like the Olympics, in order to use programming for promotional purposes. And as far as recording goes, there is also the issue of skipping ads, which most of us do. Does that affect ad prices for an afternoon event that's taped by many? I just don't think we can dismiss the marketing aspects of this. But in general, your comment "It will be up to NASCAR to figure out how to let you watch all their "race speed" content on any device you wish" I agree with. I just don't know what the best way to do that is (and apparently, neither do they...)<BR/><BR/>Speaking of the Yankees, I do actually have YES--but I never watch it, so I have no idea what they show. But you're saying the volume of what they have is way more than the limited amount NASCAR has available to share (even if it were deadly boring to watch hundreds of hours of batting practice...) I'm just kind of rambling here but I guess I just don't get it.<BR/><BR/>Was it worth more to TNN for some reason? Could it have been another way to increase ratings for the actual race itself? Are ESPN and Speed just being dumb? I just gotta believe there must be some kind of logic behind it. These are big companies that must have some reasonably intelligent minds behind them...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-41120083798381518562008-05-07T12:17:00.000-04:002008-05-07T12:17:00.000-04:00Thursday and Friday golf no longer airs on the big...Thursday and Friday golf no longer airs on the big cable channels except for the major tourneys. Thursday and Friday golf action is now mainly on the Golf Channel. NASCAR may have to wait until it has its own channel to have the luxury of having all practices aired.<BR/><BR/><B>It is not an issue of ad sales or marketing or anything else.</B><BR/><BR/>Yes, it is; they go hand in hand. TV is driven by ad sales, especially in this era of specialized channels. The TNN era is a thing of the past. If a company wants to step up and stream the NASCAR practice content online without announcers, that's fine (and probably the most reasonable solution), but that seems to contradict the original notion stated here, which is that practice is about telling the stories of the day from announcers, reporters, and drivers.<BR/><BR/><B>These practice sessions were on-the-air back when TNN has this TV package. Things have not progressed, they have gone backwards.</B><BR/><BR/>Again, viewers had fewer cable options then. Now they can change the channel to another of 100 or more options, or more importantly, they can turn the TV off and entertain themselves on the PC or with a Wii or video game (The new Grand Theft Auto sold half a billion dollars worth of copies last week). Execs don't have the luxury of putting something on the air which doesn't attract eyeballs. TV Viewership in general is decreasing quickly; why air something which doesn't retain viewers (and advertisers)?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-56448792525641360712008-05-07T11:44:00.000-04:002008-05-07T11:44:00.000-04:00glen,I would invite you to think about two points....glen,<BR/><BR/>I would invite you to think about two points. <BR/><BR/>First, the ability to record TV shows and play them back exists in the home, at the cable system, and in the VOD areas of the cable dial. What we are simply talking about is live "at speed" action that is being wasted. It is not an issue of ad sales or marketing or anything else. That stuff comes later. These practice sessions were on-the-air back when TNN has this TV package. Things have not progressed, they have gone backwards.<BR/><BR/>Second, there is simply no stick-and-ball sport to compare to NASCAR. BTW, F-1 has every lap on global TV but that is a bit different than the Yankees taking BP for their over one hundred games. There is only a limited amount of NASCAR product that features cars on the track, it is up to NASCAR to figure out how to make it available to those fans who want to see how their driver is doing and what the new Darlington raceway looks like with cars at speed.<BR/><BR/>As I said in my golf analogy, people laughed at Chirkinian when he brought the Thursday and Friday rounds to cable TV, now that practice is standard. It will be up to NASCAR to figure out how to let you watch all their "race speed" content on any device you wish.<BR/><BR/>JDDaly Planet Editorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13834588435004023666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-49408343740576501392008-05-07T11:25:00.000-04:002008-05-07T11:25:00.000-04:00I still think people need to get a life...just kid...I still think people need to get a life...<BR/><BR/>just kidding (really, I am). I do watch it if it's on sometimes, but...there are only so many hours in a day, ya know? Practice can be *somewhat* interesting depending on the track, but...most of the time, you don't gain a lot of knowledge. I do think qualifying should be available, even if it's not live. But I agree with anon 9:50...if there were that much untapped viewership, they'd be there.<BR/><BR/>I don't think any of the 'league' channels show *everything* (only one I watch is NFL network--but I have a dish), but NASCAR is unique. What do F1 fans have in Europe? I mean, F1 is huge there, do they get everyone on Eurosport or something, or do they have their own 'channel'? Just curious. I also agree with those saying we don't want to pay extra for that. Our Speed is on digital tier only also, that's why I got my dish (and I believe it's part of the lower tier, gymmie.) I think the difference in locations is, if they already had Speed before digital came around versus 'after' when they automatically put it on digital (we didn't have it at all until 2001 or so, so it automatically ended up on the digital tier.)Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-36201875651067730002008-05-07T09:51:00.000-04:002008-05-07T09:51:00.000-04:00Anon 8:15AM,I appreciate your comment, but this ha...Anon 8:15AM,<BR/><BR/>I appreciate your comment, but this has nothing to do with the current TV contract with ESPN.<BR/><BR/>In the old contract the cable TV networks chased every live lap that was available. <BR/><BR/>I understand very clearly that between ESPN and SPEED the rights to practice were divided in the existing TV contract. <BR/><BR/>That does not solve the problem that so many of you are just throwing your hands up and walking away from. <BR/><BR/>As Anon 8:48AM tried use the Top 35 rule for not finding qualifying worth a darn, things in NASCAR have taken one of the most dramatic turns in the 50+ year history of the sport. <BR/><BR/>We now see historic NASCAR teams outside the Top 35 thrashing in practice to get to qualifying speed and at the same time we see the top teams desperately trying to get track position on circuits like this one at Darlington.<BR/><BR/>We saw how valuable track position was on many tracks last season because of the tire issues.<BR/><BR/>I guess my point is regardless of the issues currently associated with TV rights and contracts and schedules, even a two camera shoot with no announcers and only the natural sound streamed on NASCAR.com or put up on DirecTV's NASCAR channel would be better than keeping those who want to see the product in the dark.<BR/><BR/>I appreciate your comments on this issue. It is not the last time you will be hearing about it.<BR/><BR/>JDDaly Planet Editorhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13834588435004023666noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-5750133844358092102008-05-07T09:50:00.000-04:002008-05-07T09:50:00.000-04:00"John: I agree with Stricklinfan -- we should have..."John: I agree with Stricklinfan -- we should have a dedicated TV outlet which is not considered a 'pay tier' to watch racing and all that entails" <BR/><BR/>Who is going to fund a NASCAR channel not on a pay tier? The cable companies? The satellite companies? None of the above. A NASCAR channel WOULD be on a pay tier, and I'm not convinced that every company would carry it, even on a higher tier. The NFL Network has been around now for several years and still can't get many companies to carry it because of the fee the NFL is asking for it. NASCAR would likely also ask for a high fee to offset costs - and also because it's NASCAR and they don't like to spend their own money.<BR/><BR/>I also don't understand why the subject of Nationwide practice and qualifying comes up so frequently. Couldn't it just be a ratings deal and practice doesn't get good ratings? I've never seen information which indicates NW practice and qualifying are watched by a medium to large sized group of people. If a limited amount of people are watching, the network(s) has justification not to air it. Plain as that. <BR/><BR/>Since it involves extra hours (six, as you said, and an additional day) and extra manpower, it may not be worth it to the networks financially to carry practice and/or qualifying for NW. <BR/><BR/>We ARE getting final Sprint Cup practice and qualifying along with NW qualifying on Speed Channel this week. I see no reason to complain. Getting all practices on air for either series isn't going to happen -it's unrealistic. Whether we like SPEED programming (PINKS) or ESPN programming (poker) or not, they've put it there for a reason, they attract viewers with it. Neither network is the NASCAR-only channel and therefore have no responsibility to air every NASCAR activity unless contracted to do so. Unless and until NASCAR can show that practices bring in viewers, practice won't be a priority.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-35055872495379505192008-05-07T09:18:00.000-04:002008-05-07T09:18:00.000-04:00John: I agree with Stricklinfan -- we should have...John: I agree with Stricklinfan -- we should have a dedicated TV outlet which is not considered a 'pay tier' to watch racing and all that entails -- the smaller series as well as occasionally an F1 race. SPEED would seem the obvious venue but of course the various TV contracts would preclude that. NASCAR, in its infinite wisdom (assuming it had infinite wisdom) SHOULD focus on giving fans what they want - if practice and qualifying is boring to some then switch to another channel, but those who can't get enough of racing should have the outlet at hand should they choose to watch. Saturation in some instances is a good thing! Thanks John, as always.chasehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10751889821381250237noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-38648888418145636702008-05-07T08:48:00.000-04:002008-05-07T08:48:00.000-04:00Sorry JD, but with the top 35 locked in I do not f...Sorry JD, but with the top 35 locked in I do not find watching qualifying worth it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2080132098367510832.post-64008798469112033462008-05-07T08:38:00.000-04:002008-05-07T08:38:00.000-04:00stricklinfan said: It would sure be a great time f...stricklinfan said: It would sure be a great time for an all NASCAR channel. <BR/><BR/>I'm sorry but NASCAR already gets enough money out of the fans. It's bad enough having to pay outragouse prices for ticktes,food etc at a race, but then to have to pay to watch the races? No Thanks!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com