Tuesday, March 17, 2009

NASCAR Journalists On TV: What A Concept

The off-week brings some unique television programming. Monday afternoon served-up a NASCAR journalist version of the popular NASCAR Now roundtable.

Allen Bestwick again stepped aside as host and Nicole Manske led the panelists in a discussion of a wide variety of topics. Manske has quickly moved her way through the studio host and trackside reporter roles on this TV series and now finds herself hosting the flagship show with high-profile guests.

Nate Ryan from USA Today, ESPN's own Angelique Chengelis and Michael Vega of the Boston Globe know each other quite well from the infield media centers on the circuit and began a good conversation about the sport from the start of the show.

During these off-weeks, the NASCAR Now producers try to keep the journalists in a tight little box when it comes to topics, but it never works. Once again Manske tried to direct traffic, but once conversation begins among journalists it is often inclined to continue for a while.

Unfortunately, just like SportsCenter and the endless array of ESPN studio-based programming, the music blared every time video footage (called B-roll) was added to the show. The high energy highlights-style music and often even the addition of this footage was simply distracting to the good conversation going on between the panelists.

Amid the normal reviews and comments, Chengelis stood-out with her strong comments that often sparked discussion. She called for NASCAR and Goodyear to get together and form an independent tire testing team that can get around the testing ban and focus on solving the problems the tire company is still struggling with this season.

She said some engine problems may be related to teams that have to perform or join those that have fallen by the wayside without sponsors. Ryan advanced the notion that the lack of testing was the key to this year's unexpected engine problems for teams normally known to run well.

Vega was the unknown element and he proved to be a bit unfocused in his comments. Perhaps more used to writing than appearing on TV, Vega spoke in phrases and wandered in his responses between topics. In the TV world, twenty second responses directly to the question being asked is a lesson that is taught over-and-over again.

There is an "old-timers" charity race this weekend in Bristol, TN. Although Darrell Waltrip stepped aside for a Fox Sports function, Harry Gant is racing and joined Manske as a guest by satellite. She handled the entire interview in much the same way that Bestwick excludes the panelists and handles the Monday guests.

Racers are racers, and Gant was clear on the fact that technology had advanced so quickly that he really did not know a lot about the sport at the present moment. Gant agreed that he would be interested in joining a senior tour if one became available. Manske was not at her best in this short interview.

Vega made a great point that NASCAR is still struggling to figure out how to deal with the retired drivers. He backed-up the notion that seeing the legends in cars at select venues would sell tickets for the current series. Chengelis compared the retired NASCAR drivers to the failure of senior tennis. Unable to perform at the level fans are used to seeing and simply not a good idea she stated.

"He will not admit that this was tougher than he thought," said Chengelis about Scott Speed and his Sprint Cup Series struggles. Vega said Speed was talented, but was confronting the reality of the NASCAR grind. During the run of the next three races, there is no doubt the Top 35 story will be repeated many times.

The economy reared its ugly head once again. Chengelis lives in Detroit, MI and was clear in her comments that fans are simply not attending sporting events due to finance issues. Ryan was upset that corporate sponsors were backing out and he pointed to the withdrawal of DuPont's hospitality and Budweiser leaving Kenny Bernstein on the NHRA tour at the end of the season.

Bruton Smith's recent bluster that the final race in Homestead should be moved due to the lack of infrastructure and area interest was discussed. It was Vega who correctly pointed-out that Smith's real agenda was to get both the finale and the Sprint Cup banquet moved to Las Vegas and his track.

With the NASCAR Hall of Fame finishing construction in Charlotte, the only possible move of the end of season function is to the Charlotte Convention Center. That would put the drivers and teams near home without any airfares or hotel bills involved.

Manske closed-out the show with several topics. The panel was split on Kyle or Kurt Busch having the better year. All agreed Casey Mears was overdue and this was a make or break season for him. A little Final Four review ended the festivities and Ryan admitted that he does not watch college hoops.

Every reporter roundtable has been a breath of fresh air and this was no exception. Why Chengelis was on the panel is a good question, as fans see her almost every racing weekend on TV. Ryan and Vega were smart and showed their very different perspectives on the NASCAR topics covered by the show.

Manske is also in a learning curve on this program and sometimes appeared over-matched on the specifics of the sport. As she continues her transition into a full-time ESPN on-air talent, give Manske credit for stepping away from the teleprompter and filling the Bestwick role on this program.

Next week Bestwick returns with Dale Jarrett, Ray Evernham and Andy Petree as his panelists at 5PM Monday on ESPN2.

TDP welcomes comments from readers. Just click on the comments button below. This is a family-friendly website, please keep that in mind when posting.

Thanks again for reading The Daly Planet.


Anonymous said...

It was B-O-R-I-N-G! That panel needs at least one driver or crew chief for credibility. Listening to four writers talk is stupid.

Anonymous said...

When you have someone so knowledgeable available, sure do wish ESPN would have Ryan McGee on for more than 3 minutes per season.

If anyone is successful at intimidating the media it must be Bruton Smith.

Daly Planet Editor said...

I was hoping for McGee or Ed Hinton, but no deal.

Anonymous said...

I didn't see the entire show, but what I saw was okay. I agree on the Gant interview, she was a little lost on that one. I was interested enough to keep watching. Some more 'fire' would have helped. I have no issue about an all media panel--we see all too many drivers & CC's.

Anonymous said...

I guess my TV took a nice week to die. Glad I didn't miss anything :)

@glenc1--even though I didn't get to see it I do agree. If they're informative and know their stuff, they can be just as if not better than CC/Drivers. The thing that I worry about is those who are not "camera ready" and you get the "deer in the headlight" or "pulling teeth" to get them involved. Don't want them to finally get warmed up and ready, 5 minutes before the show ends.

Anonymous said...

This show was horrible and boring. There are other shows with journalist that are very interesting. Whoever planned this, layed a bomb.

Nicole is so tied to a script, that if a person gives a different answer, she insists on going back to the script. She should not know the answers the panalist are going to give and it might seem more natural. (This is when Nate said he was disappointed with Jr and Nicole said--but that's not really your answer! He had to admit the plan was for him to say Joey.)

The question on the Final Four was a bomb! Who in the room cared? No good answers!!!!The panel looked like deer in the headlights.

Too many subjects with little time to give well-thought out answers. Nicole had to cut panalists off to move on.

The senior tour question was dumb! Who is going to pay for it? Angelique is right--who wants to keep seeing a bunch of drivers past their prime?? Have an old timers race before a real race. Have it once a year.

Nicole ought to watch HBO with their sport round tables, or even just watch someone like Jim Rome and how much time he gives his reporter guests to answer.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Anonymous said...

I recorded the show last night, but when I went to watch it and saw Allen wasn't on there or any of the normal panel, I deleted it. Monday's show is the only one I ever watch because Allen makes the show along with Evernham and Craven. Without them, it's not worth watching...

Anonymous said...

The TWIN show on the other hand was very entertaining. Kudos to SPEED for putting on NASCAR programming on an off weekend. Interesting stuff about the HOF. What a nice surprise!

Tracy D said...

Sounds as if I'm in the minority here, but I thought the show was terrific! I can listen to Nate Ryan for hours - he's a straight shooter. What you all perceived as wandering, I saw as a lively discussion. I'd love to see more of this panel, even Vega, who held his own.

The only off-putting moment for me was when Angelique said about a driver (I can't remember who, Gant?) that she'd seen him win in Michigan, she didn't need to see him drive again. It sounded cynical and cold.

Kudos for having something different and entertaining. BTW, when Angelique said the disappearance of GM from Nascar would be devastating, I wish she'd given specific examples.

TexasRaceLady said...

I missed this show, so I won't comment.

But,as someone said the TWIN show was very good. The info about the Hall in Charlotte was interesting and up-to-date.

I really enjoyed the debate about the first class of inductees.

Anonymous said...

Though this site has tried to keep the spotlight on the tire issue, not a word was mentioned.

I wonder when Copp's next apprearance will be and if it will be brought up.

Anonymous said...

I admire for Angelique for being honest and not bowing to the political correct. Most race fans want to see races. I've seen some of these senior drivers. The ones that are in the 70-80 range. They cannot even walk fast! You cannot put someone behind the wheel who has not driven for DECADES and think its entertaining.

Use these old champions in a different capacity. Have them promote the HOF, the big races, diversity programs, etc. Just keep them off the race track.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Dot said...

I liked the journalists on the panel. They can say things and not have to worry too much what BF & Co say.

I think there should be an Old Fart race at least once a year. At a track like Bristol, it should be pretty safe for the OFs. I'm tuning in.

Did anyone notice the Owner Points they showed? They weren't NASCARs.

Newracefan said...

Dot, noticed the owners points and found my self wondering haw Mark Martin connected to those scrambled words, big oops there. The Gant interview aside I thought it was a pretty good show, watching Nicole trying to rein in the journalists was half the fun. TWIN this week was vey interesting, I actually stopped multitasking and just watched the show.

Anonymous said...

If Nicole was telling me how I could move dirt across the street in a better way, I would watch her!!She is a pro!!And she is getting better with every program I have seen her on!!Keep her while you can Nascar..Because she will be moving on to bigger and better things!!